Friday, October 24, 2008

Can't a Monster Get Respect Anymore?



It's True. They Love You on Venus

Georgi did not see the blow coming.
One of Ricci’s hands buried itself in the hair that ringed his baldness, tearing the roots and causing blood to trickle down his neck like raindrops sliding down window glass. Ricci’s other hand slapped him across the face so hard that Georgi was actually blind for a moment. His knees buckled and he crumpled to the floor like a cheap card table.
Through a cotton wall, Georgi heard Mr. Chirac say, “Help him up, Ricci. My coffee approaches room temperature and I will not tolerate that.”
excerpted from "Counter Creatures," by Ferrel D. Moore

A friend once questioned the need for monsters, pointing out that people are the greater danger. Fear the vampire, or fear those who create and deploy the atomic bomb? Just try stopping a nuclear detonation with garlic and a cross. And nuclear weapons don't fear the sun, they re-create it right here on earth. Why is it, then, that all cultures still have and cherish their monsters? And, before we go any further, are monsters real or imaginary? Are they metaphors, vehicles for propogandizing world views, social and psychological whining about our insecurities and fears, or are they real?



Are monsters real or psychological metaphors? A psychologist once explained to me why he went with the metaphor theory. "Look," he said. "Vampires have no reflection. That's because if they did, what would be reflected in the mirrors we are so afraid to look in would be our own monstrous souls." It was an interesting thought. I would give it more credence if he hadn't moved to Arkansas after undergoing survivalist training since he was certain that civilization would collapse under the weight of the Y2K computer glitch. In our last correspondence he was exploring the idea of using his swimming pool as a pure water resevoir if he could just convince geese flying over his house to quit using it as an outdoor potty.



Are monsters real or an invention of Christianity and the Western Military Industrial Complex? Cryptozoologists, legitamite paranormal researchers, serious occult scientists, and good looking women who work at the CIA tire quickly of the modern trend of using monsters to advance political and social agendas. The problem is that people whose every moment of existence is wrapped in self-aggrandized politicization frequently cannot see themselves as the very monsters they are chasing. This is not fair to serious monsters or serious monster hunters. Vampires, Bigfoot, and Werewolves cry out, grunt, and even howl for attention. How can we hope to focus on gathering evidence for the reality of these traditional monsters with so much attention being lavished on Sarah Palin comedy skits on Saturday night live? What could be more terrifying that Barack Obama versus John McCain in their YouTube Dance-Off?




Dracula is seen by some as the ultimate social statement of class exploitation. From this perspective, Dracula himself loses top billing as a kick-ass supernatural monster of the night. He is actually a member of the degenerate, inbred aristocracy draining the lifeblood (money, food, healthcare, livestock and opera tickets) of the poor. Kind of Oscar Wilde with an even worse wardrobe, but a better reputation. Van Helsing's litany of vampire lore pales and is actually sort of embarassing to quote when we can instead analyze The Count with a Marxian dialectic. In fact, using this method, the only thing worse for Dracula's image would be to view him as not only an aristocrat, but as a capitalist as well. But we can transcend even that seeminly insurmountable pinnacle of horror by re-making him into an Aristocratic American Capitalist. Truly we have now created the ultimate, blood-sucking evil! Whew. That was a bit of work, wasn't it? But in the meantime, have we really given thought to how this approach makes Count Dracula himself feel? What happens to his self esteem?


Once again, we have to result to the art of channeling to get answers to these questions:



*****


Your Channeling Correspondent: Count, how does all of this use of your personhood to promote political and social agendas make you feel about yourself?

Spirit of Count Dracula: It's hard to feel good about yourself when your reduced to a metaphor for socialist or capitalist propogandists.

Your Channeling Correspondent: But?

Spirit of Count Dracula: I don't want to say it...

Your Channeling Correspondent: You're among friends here. We feel your paranormal pain.

Spirit of Count Dracula: It's like Dr. Phil says- it's not about me.

Your Channeling Correspondent: Doesn't that make you feel better?

Spirit of Count Dracula: You've got to be kidding. Doesn't anyone care about me amymore? What happened to me being the King Vampire and all that jack? Seriously? I was it. I was feared by everyone. The bats and those creepy spiders and even those freaking wolves had to do what I said. I was The Man. You know what I mean? The fog rolled out when I blew my nose. And now I'm just a metaphor for an Aristocratic American Capitalist? What's next? Do I have to become a metrosexual, too?

Your Channeling Correspondent: We'll get back to you on that.

Spirit of Count Dracula: Wait, don't go. I feel so down on myself now that I can't look in the mirror anymore- I'm afraid I'll see a metaphor.

*****

Monsters as Fabio and Scarlett Johannsen Envy surrogates also denigrate the very meaning of monsterhood. No respecting werewolf wants to be judged on their pectorals. Yet male vampires and werewolves alike have been driven to hard-core power lifting so that monster hunters in today's hectic world do no overlook them just because they are not hardbodied. Female monster without curves and full lips are similarily disdained. This is probably a direct result of the invasion of romance writers. Genghis Khan was less accomplished in taking over territory than Laurell K. Hamilton and Stephanie Meyers. What does the emphasis on looks, muscularity, pouty lips and dramatic pose do to the very concept of a being a monster? What have these romance writers done to the reality of monsters? And how does this make these monsters feel about themselves?


Many people have asked me over the years why it is that it is so difficult to gather hard core scientific proof for the existence of vampires, werewolves, and even zombies- not to mention scouring the planet in a quest to end Americo-ethno-centricity and open the world's consciousness to monsters in other lands and cultures. Here's the answer to that challenging question (minus the America is too inbred to think internationally since that is best answered by famed monster hunters Pat Buchanan and Al Franken):


Romance writers have driven monsters underground. Monsters are by definition (most of them), not all that good looking. A werewolf, for example, has a face only a mother could love. A zombie has a face only a tribe of maggots wants to get close to. So the monsters hide. They don't feel good about themselves. Their self esteem suffers because there's only so far a makeover can go. And monsters have seen the covers of books. Vampires like to hang out in bookstores to find someone they can score a pint of blood from. Readers are their type of people. But when vampires see the images modern paranormal romance writers demand they maintain- the wind-blown hair styles, the perfectly white, straight teeth, the stunning bone structure and not a pound, not an ounce, not a gram of excess body weight- well, they just fade away back into the night and chase squirrels. They just don't have the Hollywood looks romance writers are demanding. Their self esteem has been shattered.

So, we conclude by admitting that it is difficult today to scientifically validate the existence of monsters because they are hiding. They are hiding because of these three reasons: they are ashamed of being used as metaphors, they are embarassed at being used by self-stroking polical and social propogandists, and, last but not a cliched least, they have been humiliated by the romance writers turning them into fictionally sexually attractive beings that they can never be in real life. I will never, ever forget looking through my military binoculars one windy day, and seeing a bigfoot holding up a sign on a far away hill that read "I don't feel good about my weight."



He Gets More Respect Than Monsters

36 comments:

Barbara Martin said...

Why is Count Dracula using American vernacular?

Rick said...

Barbara, after running out of places to hide from disgraced pop star Michael Jackson, he moved to Toledo, Ohio to take a part time job working midnights in a glass factory. His exposure to American television over the ensuing years eroded his admittedly refined Transvlyanian accent to the point that he was actually able to order take-out in Subway sandwich shops without being detected. Prior to that, to mask his identity, he had used only Burger King drive-thrus so that the poor quality of their speaker systems would disguise his vampire self. I hope this clarifies the somewhat confusing matter.

L.A. Mitchell said...

Boy did you open a can of worms for me on this one, Rick :) I feel I must stand up for my fellow romance writers on a few points:

1)the reason paranormal romances are so popular (my theory) is that one of women's greatest fears is never truly knowing the one they entrust their heart to. We also don't want our brothers/sons/husbands to be the "bad boy" and relegate that exploration of danger to our fantasy realm. That's why Stephenie Meyer has hit the jackpot. Her vampire hero is a safe way for teenage girls to explore the forbidden.

2) I'm pretty sure you can blame Buffy and David Boreanez for starting it all. Ten years ago, editors would laugh in the face of anyone trying to sell a paranormal romance.

3) As an accomplished writer, I'm sure you know nothing we "demand" ever comes close the cover art we get. White teeth and wind blown hair sell, even if we paint our heroes as incredibly flawed, bed-headed men with whiskey on the breath for authenticity.

4) Also, I'm pretty sure Fabio has never been an "otherworldly creature" on a romance novel cover.

Viva la romance! :)

BTW, good luck on the zombie story for NaNo.

Rick said...

Actually, L.A., the only thing I love more than paranormal romance is paranormal romance writers!

I was just having a little Halloween fun.... I'm groveling, can you tell?

Will Kinshella said...

Now despite the fact that I was once quite a fan of Laurell K Hamilton (before what I thought was a decently written modern fantasy series decended into poorly written erotica) I feel I must side with the "post chastised" Mr. Moore on this one.

The classic horror villians have all but been stripped from us. Lost are the vampires, wolf-men, and Necromancers. Hell, even Frankenstine is going to need a new haircut before he's able to enter the stage.

I think some of the horror has been taken away from us.

Rick said...

It has, Will, but we at least have Jessica Albe in "Dark Angel."

JR's Thumbprints said...

Monster (vamps anyway) may be topping the charts in romance with that Twilight drivel piling up in the major book stores and a movie coming out soon. I'd rather watch a documentary on Vlad the Impaler.

Rick said...

Wow, if Vlad the Impaler can make a comeback, it's time for another Victor Frankenstein biography! I'm there for that J.R.

Middle Ditch said...

If only monsters would look like monsters, the world would be a lot safer.

I remember that my youngest daughter had three 'friends'. They would knock on the door and I would send them up to her bedroom. They were lovely girls.

Soon after my daughter moved out I cleared her room. I found a letter in which she cried out that those three 'lovely, friendly, generous girls had been bullying her terribly for the last two years. That in the end she had no option but leave home and move to the nearby town.

It made me feel terrible and guilty. How could those three be so cruel? They looked so angelic?

Is that how real monsters look? If so, we are all doomed.

lol

Rick said...

Monique, that story is simply marvelous, and if only it were imaginary you would now be the Queen of Flash Fiction.

As it is no doubt true, it reenforces what one of my old (I mean elderly) instructors taught me years ago about living in the wild. We were standing hidden among tall, dry rushes the color of wheat near a fast moving creek on a bright, on warm, clear day. The only sound til then was that of flowing water, when without prelude told me, "All the real predators in the wilds are beautiful."

I asked him about the "hut spider," known for it innocent and plain appearance but feared for its deadly poison. He grabbed my canteen, poured all the water out,spit in it, recapped it, then thrust if back toward me.

"I was," he said, "about to get to that part when you butted in."

Looking back and considering your story, this reveals to me that monsters can be beautiful, hideous, or even plain looking, which makes it all the more important in life to never give a canteen to someone with excess saliva.

Rick said...

Monique, I can't get that story of yours about your daughter and her three tormentors out of my head. I started trying to imagine what it would be like for you to find that letter, say maybe I found one like that from my daughter, and it had me near tears and rage at the same time.

Lana Gramlich said...

Don't laugh...I have that "Rappin' Rodney" 45 around here somewhere.
This post reminds me of the solitary night hikes I used to take in Canada. So many of my friends & family were worried about it & they'd ask me on occassion, "Aren't you afraid? I'd be terrified!" As you've pointed out, however, people can be far more frightening than anything I'd meet up with in the woods. People actively choose to do evil--animals just do what they need to to survive. I'd be much more afraid of going to a bar or standing in line at a bank, y'know?

Rick said...

Lana that is so very true. It's the city that is the true wildnerness. And were you serious about that Rodney Dangerfield 45rpm? That would be amazing.

Steve Buchheit said...

I bet those straight vampire fangs on covers are hard to live up to. I've not yet met a dentist that works midnights.

Akasha Savage said...

WOW Rick. Excellent post. I, for one, love every single monster, warts and all. I live, breath, read and write on the darkside. The only monster I am really afraid of being left alone with, is my own imagination!
;)

Rick said...

LOL. It's hard enough to find a dentist that works weekends, Steve!

Rick said...

You are too sweet, Akasha! And what a cool fear to have. There is a serious story in it somewhere.

Rick said...

You are too sweet, Akasha! And what a cool fear to have. There is a serious story in it somewhere.

Charles Gramlich said...

The beginning of the end for monsters for me was the tv series "Beauty and the Beast," in which a rock star looking beast had to hide out because of the human reaction to his looks. Yeah, right, as if he wouldn't have been one of the most popular fellows ever if he came out in public.

Rick said...

Hey Charles, I forgot all about that series! Boy did you call that right.

Charles P. Zaglanis said...

"I will never, ever forget looking through my military binoculars one windy day, and seeing a bigfoot holding up a sign on a far away hill that read "I don't feel good about my weight."

This made me laugh out loud and possibly pee just a little as I took a break from rewrites. Thanks Rick

Rick said...

Hey, Chuck, anything to help a fellow writer slugging it out with re-writes. We're all rooting you on to the re-write finish line.

Good luck, buddy.

Shauna Roberts said...

Have you seen the "True Blood" on HBO, which is based on the Sookie Stackhouse series? The shapeshifter character (who has not yet been revealed as a shapeshifter) and Bill the vampire are both portrayed sympathetically, but all the other vampires so far are monstrous (as are many of the humans in the show). After the many handsome and romantic vampires in recent TV shows, "True Blood" came as a shock (but a welcome change).

L.A. Mitchell said...

No need to grovel, Rick. You know I adore you and the man that you are for owning the romance thing and putting up a Fabio pic on your blog :)

Charles was right no with that awful Beauty and the Beast series. Disney had no small part in the beast thing, too.

Happy Halloween!

Rick said...

Whew! Thanks, L.A. I can breathe again!

Happy Halloween, to you, too.

Rick said...

No, I haven't seen "True Blood," but after you and Zoe recommending it, I'm going to track it down. Its sounds edgy, and that means I'm going to like it.

Zoe Winters said...

Do you believe in Vampires?

and when I say this, let me qualify the question. I'm not asking, do you believe in goth kids who get their teeth sharpened and drink blood. Or "energy vampires."

I'm asking, do you believe in actual literal immortal beings who feed on human blood, who may or may not be from this plane of reality.

Zoe Winters said...

l.a. mitchell,

I'll disagree on one point. Some women DO want their husband to be darker. We don't all prefer fluffy kittens in our romantic relationships.

In paranormal romances the "bad boy" isn't truly "bad" in the sense of abusive or evil. I think most women who read romances with bad boys DO want a truly dominant alpha male. And some of them HAVE a dominant alpha male, but still like reading about them.

I just think they are in very short supply in western civilization. But a truly dominant alpha male, even in romance novels is not the same as an abuser, or evil bastard.

I think the problem in our culture is that women don't get taught how to tell the difference in a dominant male and an abusive male.

It's a normal part of all mammalian mating practices for the male to make a dominant display and for the female to respond to it.

But it's not "socially acceptable" in human beings now, so the only people making the "dominant display" are the abusers. I learned this lesson the hard way with my first marriage. Figured it out in time for my second marriage.

I'm not sure telling women they can't have a dominant alpha or that they don't exist, is any more healthy than chasing after an abusive male.

Women who need stronger men are miserable with weaklings.

Rick said...

Hello, Zoe. I'll do a more detailed post on your question in the future.

The scientific evidence is still out on vampires in the classic sense. However, much information that has been accumulated over the years is not available to the public, be they scientists or lay people.

In occult sciences, all beings are immortal, though their physical bodies are not. Hence, the vampiric lie of offered immortality is to offer slavery in return for something that is already free. The physical continuity offered by vampirism is also illusory. The laws of physics are immutable on this point. Extended physical existence is a complicated matter, but in essence, all things wear down except the spirit.

I'll be more concrete in my eventual posting.

Rick said...

"Women who need stronger men are miserable with weaklings."

This deserves a posting all on its own. Wait, I think you just did that!

Zoe Winters said...

That's a very interesting concept that the vampire offers a type of slavery since immortality is already there anyway. (I actually touch on this idea in SAVE MY SOUL so I don't know why I didn't extend it to vampires, lol. And sorry wasn't trying to plug my book that isn't even available yet haha)

I think it's interesting that such beings might exist on some other plane of reality. That they would be immortal because they are not constrained to this plane of existence and our laws of physics but that they could take on a physical form while within this realm.

And on the other comment I made, yes...I could go on FOREVER about male/female relationship dynamics. I "get" that there are exceptions, but the vast majority of women are somewhat submissively wired and the majority of men are somewhat dominantly wired. But socially we're not allowed to have that.

Women feel "shame" now over wanting to take care of a husband and home cause it's not "feminist" and men feel shame anytime they act at all like men. Nevermind that they aren't screaming or beating their women, you just let them be assertive once and someone will figure out a way it's oppressing women.

Rick said...

Zoe, you are now officially a gendre counter-revolutionary!

Viva- as L.A. said- la romance!

Rick said...

And Zoe, book plugs are especially welcome on this blog!

K.Lawson Gilbert said...

"...seeing a bigfoot holding up a sign on a far away hill that read "I don't feel good about my weight."

Rick that is priceless. I loved this whole darn post. Very clever.
Is the channeling correspondent a regular feature? I love that Count Dracula quoted Dr.(he makes me sick) Phil - saying "It's not all about me."

Very interesting hypothesis - whether or not monsters are simply vehicles for purposely distorted info.

I agree completely with Middle Ditch who states:
"If only monsters would look like monsters, the world would be a lot safer."

Everytime I wanted to date a good looking boy next door type, my mom would remind me of Ted Bundy.

And I am coming to believe that the true monsters of our day are the bacteria and viruses that are not even seen - and cancer, et.al.
Those are really scary!

Vesper said...

Brilliant!

By consorting with imaginary monsters we can find a haven against and maybe even exorcise real ones…

Rick said...

Vesper, I have to credit Chuck Zaglanis with the insight. He is a horror writer, the assistant editor of Dark Wisdom Magazine, and an acquisition editor at Elder Signs Press. He had the epiphany as he watched his mother dying of cancer. You can find his blog link in my list of favorite websites.